If higher education graduates are to cope with society’s sustainability-challenges, universities must provide students with interactive, experiential, transformative, and real-world learning to suitably prepare them; say Brundiers, Wiek and Redman (2010). The authors undertook a synthesis of literature on sustainability education (an emerging academic field) with the view of determining how real-world learning can contribute to building key competencies in sustainability. Consensus exists that the capacity-uilding pathways of sustainability education should engage the “head, hands, and heart”.
Sustainability education is concerned with complex non-linear problems with long-term implications; that cut across economic, social, and environmental domains; not just on local but global scales; and involve high degrees of damage potential; and therefore urgency. These often manifest as a conglomerate of problems that require sophisticated “post-normal” solutions and elaborate problem-solving techniques; that challenges basic assumptions; and call for systems-thinking, anticipation, and participatory strategy-building models across established disciplines.
Key competencies in sustainability cannot be acquired by being told about sustainable development. Students need to see and work within a living learning place. They need to experience what a sustainable lifestyle means. Learning must focus on real-world problems, exposing students to corresponding real-world settings. A variety of learning models might be considered, for example project- and/or problem-based learning; service learning; and internships. However, not all real-world learning opportunities are appropriate. Some are more appropriate for extracurricular activities; whereas others do not relate well to the key features of sustainability. Brundiers, Wiek and Redman (2010: 311) present this “overview of key differences among dominant models of real-world learning formats”:
|
Project-based learning |
Service learning |
Internship |
Outcomes: what students learn/benefit |
Collaborative problem-solving capacity |
Education and teaching capacity |
Professional working experience; career development |
Practices: what students do |
Collaborating with partners to develop solution approach |
Educating people |
Assisting or working on a professional project |
Interaction with stakeholder |
Two-way knowledge generation (co-production) |
One-way knowledge transfer (students to community) |
One-way knowledge transfer (employer to student and student to employer) |
Integration of theory and practice |
Explicit, supervised by faculty and stakeholder |
Implicit, not supervised by faculty |
Implicit, not supervised by faculty |
Impacts on world |
Systemic innovation |
Support of social innovation and change |
Modular innovation |
Brundiers, K.; Wiek, A. & Redman C. L. 2010. Real-world learning opportunities in sustainability: from classroom into the real world. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11 (4): 308-324.
The journal (IJSHE) is published by Emerald Group Publishing Limited in conjunction with Society of University Leaders for a Sustainable Future (ULSF).
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.