Billett's (2006) views on work, subjectivity and learning captivated my full attention and prompted me to reconsider some personal viewpoints/assumptions.
During my undergraduate studies in pedagogy a lecturer remarked one day that 'learning is like a door on its hinges, any moment, regardless of the kind of activity, the door may swing and learning will occur'. Billett reminded me about this profound lesson, with his equally profound statement (p. 7) "[t]here is no difference between participating in work and learning". Similar to the door-metaphor, learning depends upon if the worker perceives the action as familiar or something novel -- in the case of the latter 'the door swings' and it is "generative of new learning". This is a very important notion to consider with regard to learning.
Billett defines (p. 4) work as an "individual's engagement in the goal-orientated activities that usually emanates from social and cultural purposes" and he states (p. 5) that "paid work might well be an unwelcome, but necessary intrusion" -- "there is a blurring here between non-paid and paid work" (p. 4) he remarks - learning is equally important in both. Billett (p. 4) asserts that in addition to "a cultural genesis", "a particular situated manifestation" and "in a particular workplace", work also "has personal dimensions". He further postulates that it is the "deployment of human subjectivities that shape how the work is conceptualised, engaged with and conducted".
Subjectivity, as emerging concept, defined by Billett (p. 5) "comprises the conscious and non-conscious conceptions, dispositions and procedures that constitute individuals' cognitive experience". Subjectivity is about individual "ways of engaging with and making sense of what we experience through our lived experience[s]". This sense of self is never static, but continually develops. Our individual subjectivity "compromise a set of conceptions, procedures beliefs and values and dispositions that are, in part, non-conscious (yet quickly becomes conscious when something we experience doesn't fit) and, in part, conscious" (p. 6). The concept of identity is further associated with subjectiveness, both from personal and societal perspectives.
Billett remarks that the relationship among work, subjectivity and learning is significant in order to understand how individuals learn, are motivated to and direct their own learning throughout their lives. This relationship is of utmost importance within the global emphasis on improving the capacity of human capital. Billett suggests a move away from behavioural and neo-behavioural approaches to learning, away from a focus mainly on observable performance outcomes and away from an emphasis on measurability. He urges that the social and physical context of work, as well as the dispositions and values of individuals that drive and energise them. He argues for an intertwining of the social and personal and recognition of the interdependence.
I have for a long time regarded the DACUM (designing a curriculum) method as appropriate for deciding what the work-based learning part of the integrated curriculum of a programme/qualification should entail. I have been an advocate of 'directing' the learner to achieve the predetermined measurable outcomes of the work-based learning part. Now I am not so sure any more.
Billett, S. (2006). Work, subjectivity and learning (pp. 1-20). In Billett, S., Fenwick, T. & Somerville, M (eds.) (2006). Work, subjectivity and learning - understanding learning through working life. Volume 6 of the UNESCO-UNEVOC book series on technical and vocational education and training: issues concerns and prospects. Dordrecht: Springer.